<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Life Scaling &#187; Delivery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orensol.com/tag/delivery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orensol.com</link>
	<description>Oren Solomianik's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>If Twitter Go The Advertising Model Way, They Might Hit The Jackpot</title>
		<link>http://orensol.com/2009/04/23/if-twitter-go-the-advertising-model-way-they-might-hit-the-jackpot/</link>
		<comments>http://orensol.com/2009/04/23/if-twitter-go-the-advertising-model-way-they-might-hit-the-jackpot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venture Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orensol.com/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are wild guesses all over the blogosphere as to where Twitter is headed when it comes to its business model. It has certainly <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/the-twitterverses-obsession-with-twitters-business-model/" target="_blank">become an obsession</a> to talk about it in some circles, and the air is filled with speculations &#8212; from <a href="http://calacanis.com/2008/01/02/the-three-business-models-that-make-twitter-a-billion-dollar-bus/" target="_blank">Calacanis&#8217;s advertising/subscription</a> model, through TechCrunch&#8217;s <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/10/twitter-to-start-charging-companies-for-having-an-account/" target="_blank">pro/business</a> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are wild guesses all over the blogosphere as to where Twitter is headed when it comes to its business model. It has certainly <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/the-twitterverses-obsession-with-twitters-business-model/" target="_blank">become an obsession</a> to talk about it in some circles, and the air is filled with speculations &#8212; from <a href="http://calacanis.com/2008/01/02/the-three-business-models-that-make-twitter-a-billion-dollar-bus/" target="_blank">Calacanis&#8217;s advertising/subscription</a> model, through TechCrunch&#8217;s <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/10/twitter-to-start-charging-companies-for-having-an-account/" target="_blank">pro/business</a> or <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/12/how-much-is-a-suggested-slot-on-twitter-worth-jason-calacanis-offers-250000/" target="_blank">sponsored suggested</a> accounts model, to the hilarious <a href="http://www.brianalvey.com/news/2008/05/25/twitters-business-model/" target="_blank">downtime advertising</a> model.</p>
<p>Wherever it may eventually go &#8212; and my bet is it will be a mixture of pro accounts and advertising &#8212; the advertising model in Twitter might be something very innovative, both in targeting and delivery.</p>
<h1>Targeting &#8211; Easy Semantics and The Realtime Factor</h1>
<p>Targeting a Twitter user is very convenient. They don&#8217;t have to assume or speculate anything about a user, they don&#8217;t have to track cookies and collect <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_targeting" target="_blank">Behavioral Targeting</a> data and try to determine if a user is action prone or not, or try all the other good old targeting tricks, such as geo-targeting and figuring household income. The simple nature of Twitter messages, which is very short and informative, makes them very easy to process semantically &#8212; aside from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolspeak">lolspeak</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L33t">l33t</a>, sentences are simple, usually noun/pronoun-verb-adverb-adjective. And the best part is, the user gives information about himself voluntarily &#8212; location, likes and dislikes, actions performed, etc.</p>
<p>Take me for example, in this imaginary (but could-be-true) scenario:</p>
<ul>
<li>In SFO, waiting to board flight for JFK. Coffee anybody?</li>
<li>Just saw the new Pearl Jam album, love them!</li>
<li>@johndoe Let&#8217;s meet later this evening for dinner</li>
</ul>
<p>Do you realize how much Twitter knows about me in the 5 minutes I tweeted these three? They can advertise to me flight tickets, coffee in SFO, Pearl Jam and similar music, and places to eat dinner in New York.</p>
<p>Now, you might say that Facebook or other social networks can provide similar targeting, but the realtime nature of Twitter makes it even more powerful. I might ditch Pearl Jam in a month in favor of Soundgarden, and Twitter will know that immediately. I might be in a conference and suddenly crave a steak. The relevance of the advertising is much better when my realtime wish or craving is in the equation.</p>
<h1>Delivery &#8211; Unobtrusiveness and Flow</h1>
<p>The way Twitter will deliver the ads will have a very high impact on the user responsiveness to the advertising. And the fact that Twitter has an open API and a lot of users using 3rd party clients to access it, will force them to embed the ads in the Twitter stream. They could be &#8220;full tweet ads&#8221; or they could be &#8220;tweet-appended ads&#8221;.</p>
<p>For example:</p>
<ul>
<li>In SFO, waiting to board flight for JFK. Coffee anybody?
<ul>
<li><strong>From twitter: Drink Coffee at Starbucks@SFO!</strong></li>
<li><strong>From twitter: Next time, save on airfare with MyImaginaryTravelAgent!<br />
</strong></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Just saw the new Pearl Jam album, love them!</li>
<li>@johndoe Let&#8217;s meet later this evening for dinner</li>
</ul>
<p>Or:</p>
<ul>
<li>In SFO, waiting to board flight for JFK. Coffee anybody?</li>
<li>Just saw the new Pearl Jam album, love them!</li>
<li>@johndoe Let&#8217;s meet later this evening for dinner
<ul>
<li>From johndoe: sure let&#8217;s eat a steak!<strong> (From twitter: check out the SteakHouse on 5th and 34)</strong></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h1>I&#8217;m For It, The World Is Ready</h1>
<p>I would not care receiving both these forms of advertising, if they are well integrated in the flow of my Twitter stream, and especially if they are so well targeted. I believe the <a href="http://www.nltk.org/Home" target="_blank">semantics tools </a>today are good enough to process meaning from a user&#8217;s short and simple under-140-characters sentences, since there is no hard contextual analysis to perform. And the realtime factor makes the targeting temporal-aware &#8212; they know <strong>what</strong> I need <strong>when</strong> I need it. Regardless of what payment model they choose (CPC, CPA, CPM), the targeting and delivery methods are the winners here.</p>
<p>There, I&#8217;ve contributed my part to the Twitter business model obsession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orensol.com/2009/04/23/if-twitter-go-the-advertising-model-way-they-might-hit-the-jackpot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->